Abstract：Objective Based on standards of suitability assessment of materials(SAM), this study was to establish health education written material for Kegel exercise and compare the effect with current regular material.Methods An expert group was set up to compile the Kegel exercise material, and made the first version. After the pre-survey conducted among 30 patients and revisions, final version was formed. A self-designed questionnaire survey was conducted in 145 women (aged 40-60) who came from the gynecological clinic of the outpatient, ward and community. 72 women were in the intervention group and read the health education written material, 73 women were in the control group and read the regular materials. The questionnaire survey was conducted before and after reading the materials. Scores on knowledge on Kegel exercises and subjective evalution of the materials.Results There was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in the background situation and the reading materials of the health education, which meant the two groups was in line with the homogeneity. There was statistically significant difference between the groups on the scores on knowledge on Kegel exercises and subjective evaluation of each item (P<0.01), among which the highest difference was the integrality dimension and the lowest difference was the enjoyment dimension.Conclusion The Kegel exercise health education written material which was compiled according to SAM has received better health education effect and subjective evaluation, which can be used in the health education of Kegel exercise.
刘芹,孙静. 凯格尔运动健康教育书面材料的制作及效果评价[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2017, 28(4): 311-318.
LIU Qin, SUN Jing. Evaluation of the health education written material for Kegel exercise. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health, 2017, 28(4): 311-318.
1 Cavkaytar S,Kokanali MK,Topcu HO,et al.Effect of home-based Kegel exercises on quality of life in women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence.J Obstet Gynaecol,2015,35:407-410. 2 陈小芹,方汉萍.不同强度Kegel锻炼方式对压力性尿失禁病人的影响.护理研究,2015,29:1118-1119. 3 符碧红.电刺激加生物反馈及盆底Kegel锻炼治疗压力性尿失禁疗效观察.吉林医学,2012,33:4591-4592. 4 Doak CC,Doak L,Root JH.Teaching patients with low literacy skills.2nd ed.Philadelphia:JB Lippincott Company,1996:49-60. 5 Jahan S,Al-Saigul AM,Alharbi AM,et al.Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province,Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.J Family Community Med,2014,21:186-192. 6 Rhee RL,Von-Feldt JM,Schumacher HR,et al.Readability and Suitability Assessment of Patient Education Materials in Rheumatic Diseases.Arthritis Care Res,2013,65:1702-1706. 7 胡良平,周诗国,关雪.样本含量估计与检验效能分析(一).中华脑血管病杂志(电子版),2011,5:244-250. 8 Ivnik M,Jett MY.Creating Written Patient Education Materials.Chest,2008,133:1038-1040. 9 钱跃升.健康教育及其材料制作中国妇幼保健,2000,15:587-589. 10 Smith F,Carlsson E,Kokkinkis D,et al.Readability,suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery:A mixed method design.Patient Educ Couns,2014,94:202-209. 11 VanIttersum MV,Van Wilgen CP,Groothoff JW,et al.Is appreciation of written education about pain neurophysiology related to changes in illness perceptions and health status in patients with fibromyalgia.Patient Educ Couns,2011,85:269-274. 12 Tian C,Champlin S,Mackert M,et al.Readability,suitability,and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.Gastrointest Endosc,2014,80:284-290. 13 杨青云,蒋国伶,米慧,等.济南市健康教育机构专业工作情况调查.预防医学文献信息,2004,10:152-153. 14 彭丽,李俊林,黄远霞,等.武汉市居民健康信息来源与需求形式分析.中国卫生事业管理,2010,s1:112-114. 15 庞静,魏南方,黄相刚,等.2011年全国健康教育机构传播材料制作状况分析.中国预防医学杂志,2014,15:143-147. 16 Cornforth BM,Dalgleish DJ,Bromilow J,et al.Use of an information leaflet to improve general practitioners’ knowledge of post dural puncture headache.Int J Obstet Anesth,2006,15:28-32. 17 刘董林.少儿口腔卫生健康教育材料传播效果评估.安徽预防医学杂志,2012,18:307-308.
