极早早产儿神经发育预后随访结果及影响因素分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (355 KB) HTML (39 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的分析极早早产儿(VPI)神经发育预后情况及其相关高危因素。方法对2017年1月至2019年9月期间,华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院新生儿科出院后的85例VPI进行随访,在纠正年龄1岁时通过智能发育测试(CDCC)评估神经发育预后情况。根据预后结果将VPI分为正常组(43例)和异常组(42例),列举可能对神经行为发育产生影响的临床相关因素和家庭因素,应用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析VPI神经发育预后的危险因素。结果正常组VPI出生体重为(1.6±0.2)kg,高于异常组[(1.4±0.3)kg];正常组VPI住院时间为(40.8±9.2)d,低于异常组[(45.7±9.9)d];正常组颅内出血发生率为11.6%,低于异常组(33.3%);正常组超低出生体重新生儿的发生率为14.0%,低于异常组(33.3%);正常组VPI母亲的文化程度高于异常组,正常组VPI父母对早期教育重视程度高于异常组;且正常组VPI父母积极干预率为41.9%,高于异常组(14.3%);上述指标组间差异均有统计学意义。Logistic回归分析显示,母亲文化水平不高、超低出生体重和颅内出血的发生是影响VPI神经发育预后的独立危险因素,而父母对早期教育的重视及干预的积极性是保护因素。结论母亲文化水平、出生体重、颅内出血、父母对早期教育的重视程度和干预积极性与VPI神经发育预后密切相关。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	胡晓琳
	史欢
	刘晶
	孟玉石
	罗小平
	陈玲

关键词 ：极早早产儿, 神经发育, 预后, 随访, 影响因素

Abstract：Objective To analyze the neurodevelopmental prognosis and its relevant risk factors in Very Preterm Infants(VPI).Methods From January 2017 to September 2019, 85 cases of VPI discharged from the Department of Neonatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, were followed up, and their neurodevelopmental prognosis was assessed through the Intelligent Developmental Test(CDCC) at corrected age of one year. According to the prognostic results, VPIs were divided into normal group(43 cases) and abnormal group(42 cases). The clinical related factors and family factors those may have impacts on neurobehavioral development were listed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the prognosis of VPI neurodevelopment and the risk factors.Results The birth weight of VPI in the normal group was(1.6±0.2) kg, higher than that in the abnormal group(1.4±0.3) kg. The hospital stay of VPI in the normal group was(40.8±9.2) d, lower than that in the abnormal group(45.7±9.9) d; The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage in the normal group was 11.6%, lower than that in the abnormal group(33.3%). The incidence of extremely low birth weight(ELBW) in the normal group was 14.0%, lower than that in the abnormal group(33.3%). The early education attendance and maternal education level in the normal group were significantly higher than those in the abnormal group, the VPI parents in the normal group paid more attention to early education than those in the abnormal group, and the VPI parents′ active intervention rate in the normal group was 41.9%, significantly higher than that in the abnormal group 14.3%. The aforementioned differences were all statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that the low maternal education level, ELBW, intracranial hemorrhage were independent risk factors for the prognosis of VPI neurodevelopment, while parental attention to early education and active intervention were protective factors.Conclusion Parents′ education level, birth weight, intracranial hemorrhage, and parents′ attention to early education and intervention enthusiasm are closely related to the prognosis of VPI neurodevelopment.

Key words： very premature infant neurodevelopment prognosis follow-up influencing factors

收稿日期: 2020-06-15

通讯作者: 陈玲(chenling@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn)

引用本文:

胡晓琳, 史欢, 刘晶, 孟玉石, 罗小平, 陈玲. 极早早产儿神经发育预后随访结果及影响因素分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2021, 32(4): 319-323. Hu Xiaolin, Shi Huan, Liu Jing, Meng Yushi, Luo Xiaoping, Chen Ling. Follow-up results and influencing factors of neurodevelopmental prognosis in very preterm infants(VPI). Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health, 2021, 32(4): 319-323.

链接本文:

http://cjrh.bjmu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://cjrh.bjmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V32/I4/319

1 Nist MD,Pickler RH,Steward DK,et al.Inflammatory mediators of stress exposure and neurodevelopment in very preterm infants:Protocol for the stressneuro‐immune study.J Adv Nurs,2019,75:2236-2245.
2 何俐莹,岑超,陶雪莹.新生儿中早产儿视网膜病变患病情况分析.重庆医学,2019,48:1029-1031.
3 Sutton PS,Darmstadt GL.Preterm Birth and Neurodevelopment:A Review of Outcomes and Recommendations for Early Identification and Cost-effective Interventions.J Trop Pediatr,2013,59:258-265.
4 王雪茵,周敏,张小松.出院后早产儿随访与早期综合干预依从性影响因素分析.中国公共卫生,2019,35:712-715.
5 Huang YS,Hsu JF,Paiva Te,et al.Sleep-disordered breathing,craniofacial development,and neurodevelopment in premature infants:a 2-year follow-up study.Pubmed,2019,60:287-288.
6 傅晓丹,陈晓春.集束化护理模式对早产儿智能发育及神经功能的影响.中华现代护理杂志,2016,22:4249-4252.
7 Vliegenthart RJS,van Kaam AH,Aarnoudse-Moens CSH,et al.Duration of mechanical ventilation and neurodevelopment in preterm infants.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2019,104:F631-F635.
8 龙芳,邹静静,钟迪.晚期早产儿早期神经系统发育情况及其影响因素.海南医学,2019,30:1551-1553.
9 Kline JE,Illapani VSP,He L,et al.Early cortical maturation predicts neurodevelopment in very preterm infants.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2020,105:460-465.
10 熊家玲,刘宇,喻琴.早期综合干预对早产儿生长发育的影响.中国妇幼健康研究,2016,27:1035-1037.
11 刘利蕊,武彦秋,刘霞.神经发育早期干预在早产儿纵向发育中的应用效果.中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27:414-417.
12 Linsell L,Malouf R,Morris J,et al.Risk Factor Models for Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children Born Very Preterm or With Very Low Birth Weight:A Systematic Review of Methodology and Reporting.Am J Epidemiol,2017,185:601-612.
13 赵凯怡,赵芸,潘静子.极低出生体重儿和极早早产儿随访检测及预后影响因素分析.中华物理医学与康复杂志,2015,37:24-28.
14 胡彦,李岚,黄文珍.我院近10年早产危险因素改变的回顾性研究.海南医学,2016,27:3356-3358.
15 杨丽,肖群文,熊晶晶.双胎早产儿的临床特点.中华实用儿科临床杂志,2015,30:118-121.
16 Voss W,Jungmann T,Wachtendorf M,et al.Long-term cognitive outcomes of extremely low-birth-weight infants:the influence of the maternal educational background.Acta Paediatrica,2012,101:569-573.
17 夏晓芹,卢庆晖,何丽平.早产儿出院后随访管理及早期干预对其预后的影响.南昌大学学报(医学版),2015,55:58-60.
18 Schaub S,Ramseier EP,Neuhauser A,et al.Effects of home-based early intervention on child outcomes:A randomized controlled trial of parents as teachers in Switzerland.Early Child Res Q,2019,48:173-185.