基于德尔菲法的妊娠期糖尿病患者健康教育需求问卷编制及信效度检验

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (11)

全文: PDF (405 KB) HTML (36 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的研制科学、客观及实用的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者健康教育需求问卷,为临床教育者分析GDM患者需求提供切实可行评估工具。方法理论分析、文献回顾及小组讨论问卷具体条目,选择本研究领域相关16名专家对问卷进行两轮德尔菲咨询;采用便利抽样法选择某三级甲等医院产科门诊50名GDM患者进行预调查及信效度检验。结果两轮咨询专家积极系数分别为100%、93.8%;专家权威系数分别为0.87、0.88;两轮咨询条目变异系数为0.07～0.38、0.05～0.14;肯德尔和谐系数为0.212、0.396(P＜0.001)。最终构建包括3个需求主题、24项具体需求的GDM患者健康教育需求问卷。问卷内容效度指数为0.983,Cronbach's α系数为 0.882。结论编制了具有一定科学性、客观及实用性的GDM患者健康教育需求问卷,可为开展针对性GDM患者健康教育需求及开展健康教育课程提供一定的参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	符颖
	张彩虹
	蒙莉萍
	郭洪花

关键词 ：德尔菲法, 妊娠期糖尿病(GDM), 健康教育需求, 问卷

Abstract：Objective To develop a more scientific, objective and practical health education needs questionnaire for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), providing a practical assessment tool for clinical educators to analyze the needs of GDM patients.Methods Methods including theoretical analysis, literature review and group discussion were used to discuss the specific items of the questionnaire.16 experts in the study area were selected and involved in two rounds of Delphi consultation on the questionnaire. 50 patients with GDM in the obstetrics outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital were selected by convenience sampling method for pre-survey and reliability testing.Results The recovery rates of the two rounds expert consultations were 100% and 93.8%, respectively. The authoritative coefficients of two rounds experts consultation were 0.87 and 0.88, respectively, and the coefficients of variation of entries were 0.07~0.38 and 0.05~0.14, respectively. The Kendall's coordination coefficients were 0.212 and 0.396, respectively (P<0.001). The final health education needs questionnaire for GDM patients included 3 themes and 24 specific items. The content validity index of the questionnaire was 0.983, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.882.Conclusion A more scientific, objective and practicality health education needs questionnaire for GDM patients was developed, which can provide reference for conducting health education courses targeted GDM patients' health education needs.

Key words： Delphi method gestational diabetes mellitus health education needs questionnaire

收稿日期: 2020-12-14

ZTFLH:

R17

基金资助:海南省自然科学基金青年基金项目(819QN234);海南医学院科研培育基金项目(HY2018-31)

通讯作者: 郭洪花(30531391@qq.com)

引用本文:

符颖, 张彩虹, 蒙莉萍, 郭洪花. 基于德尔菲法的妊娠期糖尿病患者健康教育需求问卷编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2022, 33(6): 544-549. FU Ying, ZHANG Caihong, MENG Liping, GUO Honghua. Development, reliability and validity of the questionnaire for education demand among gestational diabetes patients based on Delphi method. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health, 2022, 33(6): 544-549.

链接本文:

http://cjrh.bjmu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://cjrh.bjmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V33/I6/544

1 American Diabetic Association.Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.Diabetes Care,2015,38:8-16.
2 MiriamE,Tucker.IDF Atlas:About 415 Million Adults Worldwide Have Diabetes [EB/OL].[2015-12-02].http://www.Med scape.com/view article/855296.
3 Wei Y,Yang H,Zhu W,et al.International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria is suitable for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis:further evidence from China.Chin Med J(Engl),2014,127:3553-3556.
4 Canivell S,Gomis R.Diagnosis and classification of autoimmune diabetes mellitus.Autoimmun Rev,2014,13:403-407.
5 喻茜,牛晓虎,冯佩,等.妊娠早期空腹血糖对妊娠期糖尿病的影响.实用预防医学,2016,23:1207-1210.
6 HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group,Metzger BE,Lowe LP,et al.Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes.N Engl J Med,2008,358:1991-2002.
7 Sacks DA,Black MH,Li X,et al.Adverse pregnancy outcomes using the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria: glycemic thresholds and associated risks.Obstet Gynaecol,2015,126:67-73.
8 Sukumar N,Dallosso H,Saravanan P,et al.Baby Steps-a structured group education programme with accompanying mobile web application designed to promote physical activity in women with a history of gestational diabetes:study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials,2018,19:682.
9 乐杰.妇产科学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:150-151.
10 黎静,陈伟菊,黄东喜,等.93例孕28周前妊娠期糖尿病患者自我管理现状及影响因素分析.护理学报,2018,25:37-40.
11 邢冬婕,刘威,郭淑惠,等.慢性病自我管理健康教育项目在妊娠期糖尿病患者中的应用效果分析.中国妇幼保健,2016,31:929-931.
12 王华,彭幼清.2型糖尿病病人跨文化护理健康教育内容的构建.护理研究,2016,30:3102-3106.
13 胡文奕,楼妍,倪晓莎,等.基于马斯洛需求层次论的肿瘤护理研究发展.护理研究,2018,32:172-176.
14 陈佳,李映桃,王振宇,等.2018年美国妇产科学会与2019年美国糖尿病学会妊娠期糖尿病指南比较.国际妇产科学杂志,2019,46:336-341.
15 章孟星,周英凤,钟婕,等.妊娠期糖尿病临床护理实践指南的整合研究.中华护理杂志,2019,54:104-113.
16 苏涛敏,潘志刚,高俊岭.妊娠期糖尿病高危人群知信行问卷编制及信效度检验.复旦学报(医学版),2020,47:728-734.
17 陈星星.中青年高血压患者知信行量表的编制及湖南省常模构建.湖南:南华大学,2019.
18 谢亚男.麻醉科护士围麻醉期工作职责的界定研究.山西:山西医科大学,2018.
19 郭秀花.医学现场调查技术与统计学分析.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:273-276.
20 刘倩,张怀亮,许昌春,等.基于德尔菲法构建痤疮患者健康教育核心内容体系.中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志,2017,16:5lO-514.
21 赵春艳,王小芳,胡爱忠,等.应用德尔菲法构建社区护理质量评价指标体系.解放军护理杂志,2011,28:23-25.
22 浦亚楼,孟爱凤,智晓旭,等.基于德尔菲法的南京市肿瘤患者居家护理服务需求问卷编制及信效度检验.中国全科医学,2019,22:4375-4380.
23 杨慧霞.妊娠合并糖尿病临床实践指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:39-40.
24 洪普,邱海燕,陈亚旋,等.妊娠期糖尿病患者健康教育需求与护理服务模式的研究.中华现代护理杂志,2011,17:2492-2493.
25 廖新彬,王光娅,廖新美.妊娠期糖尿病患者的健康教育需求调查与对策.长江大学学报(自科版)医学卷,2007,4:89-90.
26 陶旻枫,游川,于敬龙,等.北京市妊娠期糖尿病孕妇营养认知行为调查.中日友好医院学报,2017,31:160-163.
27 田向阳,程玉兰.健康教育与健康促进基本理论与实践.北京:人民卫生出版社,2019:46.
28 陈凤转,欧阳丽芬,陈绮虹,等.妊娠期糖尿病不同家庭支持模式的探讨.中国医学创新,2019,16:164-168.
29 谭丽华,黄梅凤,由天辉.家庭支持对糖尿病患者饮食治疗依从性的影响调查.齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2013,34:955-957.