350例超声异常胎儿的染色体及全基因组拷贝数变异分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (4)

全文: PDF (703 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨胎儿超声异常与胎儿染色体核型及全基因组拷贝数变异(CNVs)的相关性。方法选择2017年7月—2019年6月在哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院产前诊断中心就诊并自愿行羊水穿刺的孕妇为研究对象,对其中350例超声提示胎儿异常的孕妇进行常规染色体核型分析高通量测序CNVs检测,比较不同超声异常指标所对应的染色体异常核型及致病性CNVs的检出率。孕妇年龄 18～45岁,孕周17～27周。结果 350例超声异常中,软指标异常243例,占69.4%,其中染色体核型异常49例,检出率20.2%;致病性CNVs 54例,检出率22.2%;超声结构异常107例,占30.6%,其中染色体核型异常29例,检出率27.1%;致病性CNVs 33例,检出率30.8%。其中有17例超声异常的胎儿染色体核型正常,而CNVs提示有致病性变异,占4.9%。结论在胎儿超声异常行产前诊断时,联合染色体核型分析和高通量测序CNVs检测有利于提高检出率,降低出生缺陷的发生风险。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	公丕东
	白洁明
	邸郅欣
	刘羽
	王超
	张玉红
	卢秀敏
	隋美萍
	王宇欣
	刘梅梅

关键词 ：胎儿超声异常, 染色体核型分析, 拷贝数变异(CNVs)

Abstract：Objective To investigate the correlation of karyotype and pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) with fetal ultrasound abnormalities. Methods Participants were pregnant women who visited to Prenatal Diagnosis Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from July 2017 to June 2019 and volunteered to have amniocentesis test. 350 cases of pregnant women with fetal abnormality indicated by ultrasound were included in our study and the detection rate of abnormal karyotypes and pathogenic CNVs corresponding with different ultrasound indicators were compared. Participants included in the study were between 18 and 45 years old with gestational age between 17 and 27 weeks. Results Among the 350 cases with ultrasound abnormality, 243 cases (69.4%) had abnormal ultrasound soft markers, of which 49 were chromosomal karyotype abnormality (20.2%), 54 had pathogenic CNVs (22.2%); 107 cases of the 350 cases were ultrasound structural abnormality (30.6%), 29 of which were chromosomal karyotype abnormality (27.1%), 33 of which had pathogenic CNVs (30.8%); Among the 350 cases, 17 cases had normal karyotype, while CNVs showed pathogenic variation, accounting for 4.9%. Conclusion In prenatal diagnosis of fetal ultrasound abnormalities, the combination of chromosomal karyotype analysis and high-throughput sequencing CNVs detection can improve the detection rate and reduce the risk for birth defect.

Key words： fetal ultrasound abnormality karyotype analysis copy number variations

收稿日期: 2020-09-08

ZTFLH:

R71

基金资助:吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金[320.6750.18558(10)]

通讯作者: 刘梅梅(mm7723@163.com)

引用本文:

公丕东, 白洁明, 邸郅欣, 刘羽, 王超, 张玉红, 卢秀敏, 隋美萍, 王宇欣, 刘梅梅. 350例超声异常胎儿的染色体及全基因组拷贝数变异分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2022, 33(2): 145-150. GONG Pidong, BAI Jieming, DI Zhixin, LIU Yu, WANG Chao, ZHANG Yuhong, LU Xiumin, SUI Meiping, WANG Yuxin, LIU Meimei. Analysis of the chromosomal and whole genome copy number variations in 350 fetuses with ultrasound abnormality. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health, 2022, 33(2): 145-150.

链接本文:

http://cjrh.bjmu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://cjrh.bjmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V33/I2/145

1 刘宸宁.早孕期系统超声切面检查在胎儿结构畸形筛查方面的应用.中外医疗,2016,35:196-198.
2 Kazemi M,Salehi M,Kheirollahi M.Down syndrome:current status,challenges and future perspectives.Int J Mol Cell Med,2016,5:125-133.
3 Lu JW,Lin L,Xiao LP,et al.Prognosis of 591 fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers during mid-term pregnancy.J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci,2017,37:948-955.
4 马涛,杨晓,岳军,等.妊娠中晚期超声软指标与胎儿染色体异常及其围生结局.实用妇产科杂志,2017,33:110-113.
5 刘百灵,王远流,蒋建穗,等.孕期超声筛查胎儿结构畸形和软指标异常的临床意义探讨.中国优生与遗传杂志,2015,23:98-100.
6 Wapner RJ,Martin CL,Levy B,et al.Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.N Engl J Med,2012,367:2175-2184.
7 Freeman,JL,Perry GH,Feuk L,et al.Copy number variation:New insights in genome diversity.Genome Research,2006,16:949-961.
8 Levy B,Wapner R.Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.Fertil Steril,2018,109:201-212.
9 何冰,黄莉,张鹏.羊水细胞高通量测序与染色体核型分析在产前诊断中的应用研究.中国临床新医学,2015,8:1113-1116.
10 Wang J,Chen L,Zhou C,et al.Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2018,219:287.e1-287.e18.
11 黄湛,白宇翔,漆洪波.美国胎儿影像指南(2014)解读.中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2015,07:587-591.
12 South ST,Lee C,Lamb AN,et al.ACMG Standards and Guidelines for constitutionalcytogenomic microarray analysis,including postnatal and prenatal applications:revision.2013.Genet Med,2013,15:901-909.
13 金雪鸿,陈鹏龙,陈明妹.等.染色体芯片检测下胎儿心脏发育异常与遗传学异常相关性.中国现代医生,2020,02:111-115,193.
14 Jansen FA,Blumenfeld YJ,Fisher A,et al.Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects:a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2015,45:27-35.
15 刘洋,谢建生,耿茜,等.G显带和多重连接依赖探针扩增联合分析心脏发育畸形胎儿的染色体异常.中华医学遗传学杂志,2017,34:1-5.
16 Committee Opinion No.682:Microarrays and next-generation sequencing technology:The use of advanced genetic diagnostictools in obstetrics and gynecology.Obstet Gynecol,2016,128; e262-262e268.
17 Luo S,Meng D,Li Q,et al.Genetic testing and pregnancy outcome analysis of 362 fetuses with congenital heart disease identified by prenatal ultrasound.Arq Bras Cardiol,2018,111:571-577.
18 中华医学会医学遗传学分会临床遗传学组.低深度全基因组测序技术在产前诊断中的应用专家共识.中华医学遗传学杂志,2019,4:293-296.
19 Ting YH,Lao TT,Lau TK,et al.Isolated absent or hypoplasticnasal bone in the second trimester fetus:is amniocentesisnecessary?.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2011,24:555-558.
20 王咏梅,曹荔,吴云,等.胎儿超声结构畸形与染色体微阵列分析的相关性.中国医学影像学杂志,2017,12:919-922.
21 Edwards L,Hui L.First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med,2018,23:102-111.
22 Shirai K,Higashi Y,Shimojima K,et al.An Xq22.1q22.2 nullisomy in a male patient with severe neurological impairment.Am J Med Genet A,2017,173:1124-1127.
23 Lan L,Wu H,She L,et al,Analysis of copy number variation by sequencing in fetuses with nuchal translucency thickening.J Clin Lab Anal,2020,34:p.e23347.