中国五城市流动育龄妇女围孕保健服务满意度影响因素研究

王欣, 刘鸿雁, 武继磊, 朱琳, 裴丽君

中国生育健康杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1) : 1-6.

PDF(444 KB)
欢迎访问《中国生育健康杂志》官方网站!今天是 2025年4月4日 星期五
PDF(444 KB)
中国生育健康杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1) : 1-6.
妇幼保健

中国五城市流动育龄妇女围孕保健服务满意度影响因素研究

  • 王欣, 刘鸿雁, 武继磊, 朱琳, 裴丽君
作者信息 +

Factors associated with satisfaction of periconceptional health care among floating women in five cities of China

  • WANG Xin, LIU Hongyan, WU Jilei, ZHU Lin, PEI Lijun
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 了解流动育龄妇女围孕保健服务现状和满意程度,分析其满意度的影响因素,为改善流动育龄妇女的优生健康质量提供依据。方法 利用2005年北京、南京、厦门、深圳和重庆五城市流动人口生殖健康抽样调查数据,描述分析流动育龄妇女围孕保健服务利用及满意程度分布情况,对影响满意度的有关因素进行多因素分析。结果 5 399例有效调查问卷中,流动育龄妇女在流入地的围孕保健服务利用率为41.1%,其中对服务满意者占63.3%。多因素Logistic回归分析发现,流动育龄妇女对围孕保健服务的满意度在调查地区间存在差别,差异有统计学意义;自评健康状况一般(OR=1.79,95%CI:1.43~2.25)或身体状况差(OR=1.87,95%CI:1.10~3.16)、检查婚育证明(OR=1.63,95%CI:1.20~2.22)、未参加计生部门宣教活动(OR=1.28,95%CI:1.04~1.57)、自行前往参与服务(OR=1.54,95%CI: 1.22~1.94)、付费检查(OR=1.36,95%CI:1.08~1.72)、服务态度差(OR=2.33,95%CI:1.81~2.99)、设施环境差(OR=1.54,95%CI:1.20~1.97)与较高的不满意度存在统计学关联。结论 自评健康状况一般或差、无婚育证明、未参加计生部门宣教活动、自行前往孕检、付费检查、服务态度差、设施环境差与较高的不满意度有关,建议将计生服务与围孕保健相结合、积极促进流动育龄妇女社会融入、提供优惠、专业的保健服务,提高流动育龄妇女对围孕保健服务满意度,有助于降低不良妊娠结局发生风险。

Abstract

Objective To understand current status of periconceptional health care and satisfaction towards the service among floating childbearing age women. Methods Using data from reproductive health survey of floating population from five cities in 2005, we analyzed the distributions of periconceptional health care services and perceived satisfaction among floating women. Results Among 5 399 cases with valid questionnaires, 41.1% of floating women received periconceptional health care in the inflow areas. Among them, 63.3% satisfied with the service. Self-rated health status as “fair” (OR=1.79, 95% CI:1.43-2.25) or “poor” (OR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.10-3.16), without being checked family planning certificate (OR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.20-2.22), not attending outreach activities (OR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.04-1.57), seeking examination by themselves (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.22-1.94), self-payment for the examination (OR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.08-1.72), bad service attitude (OR=2.33, 95% CI:1.81-2.99), and poor facilities and circumstance (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.20-1.97) were associated with the odd of dissatisfaction. Conclusion Several personal and service-related factors were identified to be associated with dissatisfaction with preconceptional care services. Combining family planning service and periconceptional health care, actively promoting the social integration among floating women of childbearing age, and providing favorable and professional service may help improve service satisfaction.

关键词

流动育龄妇女 / 围孕保健 / 满意度 / 影响因素

Key words

Floating women of childbearing age / Periconceptional health care / Satisfaction degree / Factors

引用本文

导出引用
王欣, 刘鸿雁, 武继磊, 朱琳, 裴丽君. 中国五城市流动育龄妇女围孕保健服务满意度影响因素研究[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2015, 26(1): 1-6
WANG Xin, LIU Hongyan, WU Jilei, ZHU Lin, PEI Lijun. Factors associated with satisfaction of periconceptional health care among floating women in five cities of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health, 2015, 26(1): 1-6

参考文献

1 Liu HY,Guo DP. The Chinese floating population reproductive health survey report. Beijing: China Population and Development Research Center,2005,1-49.
2 Posner SF,Johnson K,Parker C,et al. The national summit on preconception care: a summary of concepts and recommendations. Matern Child Health J,2006,10:S197-205.
3 Oliver RL,Swan JE.Equity and disconfirmation perceptions as influence on merchant and product satisfaction.J Consum Res,1989,116: 372-393.
4 刘艳,刘启兰,胡娅莉,等. 江苏省26803例围生儿出生缺陷监测. 中国生育健康杂志,2010,21: 152-154.
5 周萍. 2004-2008年薛城区孕前医学检查与出生缺陷分析. 中国生育健康杂志,2010,21: 176-177.
6 Jack BW,Culpepper L. Preconception care:Risk reduction and health promotion in preparation for pregnancy. JAMA. 1990,264: 1147-1149.
7 House of Commons Health Committee. Maternity services: preconcep2tion. Health Committee fourth report. London,HMSO,1991.
8 Czeizel AE. Ten years of experience in periconceptional care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,1999,84:43-49.
9 陈功,宋新明,王海涛,等. 孕前保健的效果和收益. 中国计划生育学杂志,2006,14: 657-659.
10 钟兴明,韦相才,张迪,等. 广州、深圳市流动人口生殖健康服务利用影响因素分析. 中国妇幼保健,2013,28: 3135-3139.
11 郑晓瑛,宋新明. 提高出生人口素质的孕前围孕保健模式的再讨论. 人口与发展,2012,18: 56-60.
12 高明. 新时期流动人口计划生育管理研究—以南通市为例. 苏州: 苏州大学,2011.
13 崔岩. 流动人口心理层面的社会融入和身份认同问题研究. 社会学研究,2012,141-160.
14 王胜今,许世存. 流入人口社会融入感的结构与影响因素分析—基于吉林省的调查数据. 人口研究,2013,35: 5-14.
15 刘静. 流动人口基本公共服务均等化研究一以杭州巿为例. 杭州: 浙江大学,2012.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(41271439);2010年教育部人文社会科学规划项目基金 (10YJA840030);中国流动人口生殖健康服务状况调查(国人口调[2005] 4号)

PDF(444 KB)

129

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/