Abstract:Objective To analyze the relationship of chromosomal status and pregnancy outcomes in different degrees of fetal ventriculomegaly. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 157 singletons diagnosed with ventriculomegaly by ultrasonography and nuclear magnetic resonance examination from March 2014 to March 2017 at Peking University Third Hospital. The cases were divided into mild group (10-12 mm), moderate group (12.1-14.9 mm) and severe group (≥15 mm). We performed invasive prenatal diagnosis (karyotype+SNP-array), and followed up the pregnancy outcome and neonatal development. Results Among the 157 patients, 35.0 % ventriculomegaly fetus were combined with other malformations, of which the rate was 23.5 % in mild group, 52.0 % in moderate group and 66.7 % in severe group, respectively. There were statistical significances among the three groups, and the abnormal rate increased as the width of ventriculomegaly enlarged (Contingency Coefficient=0.304, P=0.000). With 59 patients invasive prenatal diagnosed, we found 3 cases with microdeletion:46,XN,del(19) (p13.3p13.2)(2.1Mb); 46,XN,del(17) (p13.3p13.2) (4Mb); 46,XN,del(4) (q21.23q22.23)(10.9Mb), and 4 cases with chromosome polymorphism:46,XY,inv(9)(p11q12); 46,XY,14pstk+; 46,XY,inv(9)(p11q12); 46,XX,15pstk+. There were 90 cases delivered, 43 cases lost, and 24 cases who induced labor. There were statistical significances among the three groups of induced labor, and the rate increased as the width of ventriculomegaly enlarged (Contingency Coefficient=0.3,P=0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the prognosis of three groups of neonates. Conclusion Invasive prenatal diagnosis towards mild ventriculomegaly is necessary. There might also be a poor prognosis although the results of genetic test are normal.
李怡梅,龚丽君,魏瑗,杨静,李瓅. 157例核磁确诊侧脑室增宽胎儿产前诊断及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2019, 30(4): 327-331.
LI Yimei, GONG Lijun, WEI Yuan, YANG Jing, LI li. Prenataldiagnosis and pregnancy outcome analysis of 157 cases with fetal ventriculomegaly scanned by MRI. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health, 2019, 30(4): 327-331.