205例羊水细胞嵌合体的产前诊断结果分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (812 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的分析205例羊水细胞嵌合体的产前诊断结果和妊娠结局,为嵌合体的遗传咨询和临床解释提供参考。方法对2018年1月至2019年11月中国医科大学附属盛京医院临床遗传科羊水细胞嵌合体病例的核型复查结果和基因组拷贝数测序(copy number variations sequencing, CNV-seq)检测结果进行回顾分析,并回访部分孕妇的妊娠结局。结果在7 225例羊水核型结果中共有205例嵌合体,发生率为2.8%。其中Ⅰ级嵌合为153例,占比74.6%,多数为常染色体数目异常嵌合;Ⅱ级嵌合为18例,占比8.8%;Ⅲ级嵌合为34例,占比16.6%;Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级嵌合中多数为性染色体数目异常嵌合。20例患者核型复查结果显示,14例Ⅰ级和3例Ⅱ级嵌合病例的核型复查结果均为正常;1例Ⅱ级常染色体嵌合病例复查结果为Ⅲ级嵌合;2例Ⅲ级性染色体数目嵌合病例复查后均为正常核型。76例孕妇CNV-seq检测结果显示,53例Ⅰ级嵌合的CNV-seq检测结果均未提示嵌合。通过对比发现CNV-seq结果与核型结果不完全一致,包括CNV-seq是否检测到嵌合、嵌合比例、嵌合类型等。结论 Ⅰ级嵌合和Ⅲ级嵌合的真伪性基本可以确定,孕妇有关Ⅱ级嵌合的后续选择需综合评估。单独应用CNV-seq检测染色体嵌合体仍存在一定的风险,核型检测嵌合体的优势不可替代,两种以上的实验方法联合应用有助于快速准确判定染色体嵌合体。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	赵小秋
	崔婉婷

关键词 ：产前诊断, 嵌合体, 遗传咨询

Abstract：Objective In order to provide references for the genetic counselling and clinical explanations of chromosome mosaicism, our research analyzed the prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes in 205 cases with mosaicism in amniotic fluid cells. Methods We retrospectively studied the resampling karyotypes and copy number variations sequencing (CNV-seq) results of the mosaicism cases in the Department of clinical genetics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from Jan 2018 to Nov 2019, and several pregnancy outcomes were followed up. Results 205 mosaicism cases were found in a total of 7225 cases, with the rate of 2.8%. Among them, 153 (74.6%) cases and 18 (8.8%) cases were classified as level Ⅰ and level Ⅱ mosaicism separately, and level Ⅲ mosaicism was considered in the remaining 34 cases (16.6%). Most of levelⅠmosaicism cases were mosaic autosomal aneuploids, and mosaic sex chromosome aneuploids were majorities in level Ⅱ and level Ⅲ mosaicism. 20 patients underwent resampling, in which normal karyotypes were separately diagnosed in 14 cases with level Ⅰand 2 cases with levelⅡmosaicism, and 2 cases with level Ⅲ mosaic sex chromosome aneuploids; level Ⅲ was re-identified in one case with levelⅡ mosaic autosomal aneuploids. CNV-seq was performed in 76 cases and mosaicism was not detected in 53 cases with level Ⅰmosaicism. With the comparison between karyotypes and CNV-seq results, we found that CNV-seq couldn't detect the mosaicism in all of cases, and the constitutions of mosaicism were not entirely consistent. Conclusion The authenticity of level Ⅰand level Ⅲ mosaicism could be almost ascertained, and the subsequent options on level Ⅱmosaicism should be evaluated comprehensively. The mosaicism could be missed by the single application of CNV-seq and the usage of karyotype was irreplaceable. The combination of multiple methods were useful for judging the mosaicism rapidly and accurately.

Key words： prenatal diagnosis mosaicism genetic counselling

收稿日期: 2021-04-16

ZTFLH:

R71

通讯作者: 崔婉婷 (cwtwork1986@163.com)

引用本文:

赵小秋, 崔婉婷. 205例羊水细胞嵌合体的产前诊断结果分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2022, 33(1): 18-22. ZHAO Xiaoqiu, CUI Wanting. Analysis of prenatal diagnosis outcomes of 205 cases with mosaicism in amniotic fluid cells. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health, 2022, 33(1): 18-22.

链接本文:

http://cjrh.bjmu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://cjrh.bjmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V33/I1/18

1 Hsu LY,Benn PA.Revised guidelines for the diagnosis of mosaicism in amniocytes.Prenat Diagn,1999,19:1081-1082.
2 黄道奇,涂华玉,王朝红,等.羊水细胞载玻片原位培养法在产前诊断中的应用.中华医学遗传学杂志,2020,10:1117-1119.
3 Harton GL,Cinnioglu C,Fiorentino F.Current experience concerning mosaic embryos diagnosed during preimplantation genetic screening.Fertil Steril,2017,107:1113-1119.
4 Grati FR,Gallazzi G,Branca L,et al.An evidence-based scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos following preimplantation genetic screening.Reprod BioMed Online,2018,36:442-449.
5 Nadesapillai S,van der Velden J,Smeets D,et al.Why are some patients with 45,X Turner syndrome fertile? A young girl with classical 45,X Turner syndrome and a cryptic mosaicism in the ovary.Fertil Steril,2020,S0015-0282(20)32674-1.
6 Rius M,Daina G,Obradors A,et al.Comprehensive embryo analysis of advanced maternal age related aneuploidies and mosaicism by short comparative genomic hybridization.Fertil Steril,2011,95:413-416.
7 Kort DH,Chia G,Treff NR,et al.Human embryos commonly form abnormal nuclei during development:a mechanism of DNA damage,embryonic aneuploidy,and developmental arrest.Hum Reprod,2016,31:312-323.
8 Li X,Hao Y,Elshewy N,et al.The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.J Assist Reprod Genet,2020,37:497-508.
9 Tyl H Taylor,Susan A Gitlin,Jennifer L Patrick,et al.The origin,mechanisms,incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans.Hum Reprod Update,2014,20:571-581.
10 Grati FR.Chromosomal Mosaicism in Human Feto-Placental Development:Implications for Prenatal Diagnosis.J Clin Med,2014,3:809-837.
11 Chen CP,Hsu TY,Ko TM,et al.Cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 15 at amniocentesis.Taiwan JObstet Gynecol,2020,59:728-735.
12 Liang D,Peng Y,Lv W,et al.Copy number variation sequencing for comprehensive diagnosis of chromosome disease syndromes.J Mol Diagn,2014,16:519-526.
13 Zhao X,Fu L.Efficacy of copy-number variation sequencing technology in prenatal diagnosis.J Perinat Med,2019,47:651-655.
14 VanOpstal D,Diderich KEM,Joosten M,et al.Unexpected finding of uniparental disomy mosaicism in term placentas:Is it a common feature in trisomic placentas? Prenat Diagn,2018,38:911-919.
15 Zhang Y,Zhong M,Zheng D.Chromosomal mosaicism detected by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.J Cell Mol Med,2021,25:358-366.