摘要目的 探讨宫腔镜下子宫纵隔切除术对IVF/ICSI-ET患者妊娠结局的影响。方法 回顾性分析2014年1月~2018年12月本院生殖医学中心首次接受 IVF/ICSI-ET 66例纵隔子宫切除术患者的妊娠结局。根据不孕类型、年龄、BMI、不孕年限、移植胚胎数、HCG日内膜厚度等指标选择同中心首次行IVF/ICSI且行新鲜胚胎移植的宫腔形态正常的患者,进行倾向性评分个体匹配,匹配比例为1:3。比较纵隔子宫术后组和宫腔形态正常组患者IVF/ ICSI-ET术后妊娠结局。结果 两组患者BMI、基础FSH及LH水平和E2水平、Gn用量、Gn使用天数、获卵数等均无统计学差异(p>0.05)。临床妊娠率(71.2% vs 64.7%)、早期流产率(8.5% vs 7.0%)、活产率(56.1% vs 56.1%)、晚期流产率(8.5% vs 3.1%)、分娩孕周(37.9±2.3 vs 37.8±2.4)在纵隔子宫术后组和宫腔形态正常组的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 子宫纵隔不孕症患者在IVF/ICSI助孕前行宫腔镜下子宫纵隔切除术后,宫腔形态恢复正常者,不会对临床妊娠结局产生负面影响,可得到与宫腔形态正常不孕症患者行IVF/ICSI助孕相似的临床妊娠结局。宫腔镜下子宫纵隔切除术(TCRS)对于子宫纵隔不孕症患者来说,安全有效。
1 唐立新,王奇玲,文任乾,等.广东省初婚夫妇不孕症发病率现状调查.中国预防医学杂志,2005,6:106- 108. 2 Esmaeilzadeh S,Delavar MA,Zeinalzadeh M,et al.Epidemiology of infertility:a population- based study in Babol,Iran.Women Health,2012,52:744-754. 3 Bhattacharya S,Porter M,Amalraj E,et al.The epidemiology of infertility in the North East of Scotland.Hum Reprod,2009,24:3096-3107. 3 Chan YY,Jayaprakasan,Zamora J,et al.The prevalence of congeni-tal uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations:a sys-tematic review.Hum Reprod update,2011,17:761-771. 4 Raga F,Bauset C,Remohi J,et al.Reproductive impact of congenital mullerian anomalies.Hum Reprod,1997,12:2277-2281. 5 Woelfer B,Salim R,Banerjee S,et al.Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening.Obstet Gynecol,2001,98:1099-1103. 6 Ma SQ,Bian XM,Lang JH.Pregnancy and its outcome in women with malformed uterus.Chin Med Sci J,2002,17:242-245. 7 莫洪敏,于江.无气腹腔镜联合宫腔镜手术治疗纵膈子宫的临床价值研究.中外医疗,2015,20:57-59. 8 刘尧芳,鲁照明,詹平,等.宫腔镜子宫中隔切除术对妊娠结局的影响.实用妇产科杂志,2014,30:781-783. 9 Homer HA,Li T-C,Cooke ID.The septate uterus:a review of management and reproductive outcome.Fertil Steril,2000,73:1-14. 10 Acien P.Incidence of mullerian defects in fertile and infertile women.Hum Reprod 1997,12:1372-1376. 11 张茜,刘影.子宫畸形的分型及比较影像学.中国CT和MRI杂志,2014,11:108-111. 12 章梦薇,张国福,韩志刚,等.先天性子宫畸形的磁共振诊断价值.中国临床医学影像杂志,2012,23:335-337. 13 Grimbizis GF,Gordts S,Di Spiezio SA,et al.The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.Hum Reprod,2013,28:2032-2044. 14 Gruszka M,Wilczynski J,Nowakowska D.Prevalence of uterine malformations and their impact on fertility.Ginekologia Polska,2012,83:517-521. 15 Abuzeid M,Ghourab G,Abuzeid O,et al.Reproductive out-come after IVF following hysteroscopic division of incomplete Uterine septum/areuate uterine anomaly in women with prima-Ry infertility.Facts Views Vis Obgyn,2014,6:194-202. 16 Taylor E,Gomel V.The uterus and fertility.Fertil Steril,2008,89:1-16. 17 Raga F,Casan EM,Bonilla-Musoles F.Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in the endometrium of septate uterus.Fertil Steril,2009,92:1085-1090. 18 Schaer G,Koelbl H,Voigt R,et al.Recommendations of the German Association of Urogynecology on functional sonography of the lower female urinary tract.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,1996.7:105-108. 19 Rikken JFW,Kowalik CR,Emanuel MH,et al.Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus:an international multicentre open-label randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod.2021,36:1260-1267. 20 Shokeir T,Abdelshaheed M,El-Shafifie M,et al.Determinants of fertility and reproductive success after hysteroscopic septoplasty for women with unexplained primary infertility:a prospective analysis of 88 cases.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2011,155:54-57. 21 Tonguc EA,Var T,Batioglu S.Hysteroscopic metroplasty in patients with a uterine septum and otherwise unexplained infertility.Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2011,113:128-130. 22 Tomaževi<inline-formula><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="Mml1-1671-878X-34-5-479"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="normal">?</mml:mtext></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> T,Ban-Frangež H,Virant-Klun I,et al.Septate,subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI.Reprod Biomed Online,2010,21:700-705. 23 Sugiura-Ogasawara M,Lin BL,Aoki K,et al.Does surgery improve live birth rates in patients with recurrent miscarriage caused by uterine anomalies? J Obstet Gynaecol,2015,35:155-158.
